|
The BBFC reduces the rating of 2 films in the series from 18 to 15
|
|
|
| | 30th June 2021
|
|
| |
Amityville 4 The Evil Escapes is a 1989 USA horror by Sandor Stern Starring Patty Duke, Jane Wyatt and Fredric Lehne
The demonic force lurking in Amityville for over 300 years escapes to a remote California mansion. It encounters a struggling family living together by uncertain means. The beast manipulates a little girl by manifesting
itself in the form of her dead father. Soon it will be able to possess her completely... is it too late for a young priest to defeat the demon and end the curse? UK: Passed 15 uncut for strong supernatural threat, bloody images,
violence:
- 2021 Screenbound Pictures Ltd video
Amityville 1992 - It's About Time is a 1992 USA horror by Tony Randel Starring Stephen Macht, Shawn Weatherly and Megan Ward
An architect brings home a mysterious old clock, not knowing that it's haunted by the demonic presence of the Amityville house. Soon, the clock begins to alter time and space and starts to possess members of the household.
UK: Passed 15 uncut for strong gore, violence, threat, language, sexual threat, sex:
- 2021 Screenbound Pictures Ltd video
Both films have had previous 18 ratings reduced by the BBFC to the current 15 ratings. |
|
The BBFC re-rates Local Hero from PG to 12A over implied strong language
|
|
|
|
| 28th June 2021
|
|
| 25th June 2021 Original post |
Local Hero is a 1983 UK comedy drama by Bill Forsyth Starring Burt Lancaster, Peter Riegert and Fulton Mackay
The film has just been uprated from PG to 12A in 2021 with the BBFC citing
'infrequent partial use of strong language (eg "motherfu...")'. The BBFC changed its strong language policy in 2021 to treat obscured strong language as if it had been fully voiced. Summary Notes
An American oil company has plans for a new refinery and sends someone to Scotland to buy up an entire village, but things don't go as expected. UK: Passed 12A uncut for implied strong language,
moderate sex references:
Update: Motherfu...ing Stupidity: The BBFC And 'Implied Language'
28th June 2021. See article from reprobatepress.com The British censor's curious decision to treat
implied swearing no differently than if the actual word had been used. |
|
and according to the BBFC, parents want children protected
|
|
|
| 9th June 2021
|
|
| Thanks to Nick See press
release from bbfc.co.uk See strong language policy from bbfc.co.uk |
The BBFC has released a new survey into attitudes towards swearing which shows that while the use of strong language is on the rise, parents are keen to protect their children and do not want to see increased use of strong language in media content. The survey, carried out by Magenta, was commissioned to find out if parents would accept more frequent uses of strong ('fuck') and very strong language ('cunt') at the 12 and 15 categories, and to understand people's opinions and use of these words in their lives. The report showed that 60% say swearing is part of their daily life, with 30% saying they use strong language more than five years ago.
The survey showed that people think that the BBFC is getting it right when it comes to classification of strong and very strong language in films and TV content. People feel that there is a time and a place for using stronger language, and
therefore do not want to see an increase in strong and very strong language at the 12 category. 61% agree that while they are comfortable using strong language with friends they refrain from doing so if children can hear. Only 20% parents say they're
comfortable swearing in front of children under 16 at home because they are keen to shield their kids as long as possible. The survey showed that how words are said raises more concerns than what is said. Language feels more problematic and/or adult
when it is; directly targeted at an individual, or used in an aggressive way, especially when used by men towards women; used in a sexual context; used in a sexually violent way or referencing abuse, rape, coercion, or sexually aggressive behaviour. David Austin, Chief Executive of the BBFC, said:
Children are watching more content on multiple screens, and their parents want to protect them from strong and very strong language wherever they can and for as long as possible. Parents told us they are keen for media
industries to share the responsibility - and that's where we come in. Very strong language retains an innate shock value, and for some remains the last taboo. While it can occur in a variety of contexts, including comic and colloquial, it has a
particularly distressing potency when used towards women - so it's reassuring to hear people think we are getting it right when it comes to classifying these words. For the first time, the BBFC has also published a guide to what terms
parents can expect to hear in films and TV shows in the U, PG and 12A/12 categories. The guide lays out common words that are permitted at the junior categories, and also includes sections on Hindi language. David Austin added:
This research has underpinned our knowledge that parents are the gatekeepers when it comes to language at the lower age ratings, U, PG and 12A/12. This is why we've launched our guide to terms at the junior categories, so that parents
can feel empowered and confident when choosing content that is right for their families. Despite parents being keen to protect their children for as long as possible, there's a clear generational divide when it comes to swearing, with
46% of Gen Zs frequently using strong language daily, compared to only 12% of 55-64 year olds and 12% of over 65s. 25% of 16-24 year olds say they would never use strong language in public, compared to75% of over 65s. When it comes to acronyms -
for example WTF - people felt that the meaning is rarely lost on viewers, including children. In most cases, they are treated as if the word were spoken in full. Therefore, the BBFC will classify acronyms as if they are a use of strong language in full.
The BBFC's list of language vs age rating is as follows
| 'damn', 'hell', 'God', 'Jesus Christ'. We know that some people find these words particularly offensive, but our
research shows us that the majority of parents are comfortable with their children hearing them in U rated films. 'butt', 'jerk'. And, depending on the context, you may also hear the word 'screw' if it is used instead of 'messed up', eg. 'I
screwed up'. | | At PG, we only allow mild bad language. If words are used in an aggressive or very frequent
way, then this might result in the content being rated higher. 'bloody', 'bugger', 'son of a bitch', 'shit', 'arsehole', 'bastard', 'bollocks', 'piss', 'crap', 'arse', 'ass', 'sod', 'git', 'arse'. |
| Prick, wanker, twat, bitch, whore, slag, slut, cock, Depending on context,
frequency, and tone: fuck' |
|
|
Both the 18 rated uncut version and the 15 rated cut version have been passed by the BBFC for home video
|
|
|
| 8th June
2021
|
|
| Thanks to remoaner flowers
|
The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It is a 2021 USA horror mystery thriller by Michael Chaves Starring Vera Farmiga, Patrick Wilson and Julian Hilliard
Uncut and MPA R rated in the US. This was initially rated 18 uncut, by the BBFC but the distributors preferred a cut 15 rated version for 2021 cinema release. The film is rated 16 uncut by IFCO for Irish cinema release. Both
the uncut 18 rated version and the cut 15 rated have just been passed for home video release but it is not yet clear which versions will be released on which formats. Summary Notes
A chilling story of terror, murder and unknown evil that shocked even experienced real-life paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren. One of the most sensational cases from their files, it starts with a fight for the soul of a
young boy, then takes them beyond anything they'd ever seen before, to mark the first time in U.S. history that a murder suspect would claim demonic possession as a defense. Versions
category cuts
| | UK: The UK edit was passed 15 for strong threat, horror, violence after BBFC category cuts:
- 2021 Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd video
- 2021 cinema release
The BBFC commented: The distributor chose to reduce bloody injury detail in a suicide scene in order to obtain a 15 classification. An uncut 18 classification was available. Of course the BBFC is referring to vertical
wrist slitting which is disallowed at 15. | uncut
| Ireland
| UK: Passed 18 uncut for strong injury detail, horror:
- 2021 Warner Bros Entertainment UK Ltd video
- 2021 cinema release, unreleased as the distributors opted for a cut 15 release
Ireland: Rated 16 uncut for very strong gory violence. It is reported that the Irish 16 rated cinema release is the uncut version running at 111:44s
US: Uncut and MPA R
rated for terror, violence and some disturbing images. |
|
|
The BBFC reviews the classification of strong language
|
|
|
| 7th June 2021
|
|
| See report
[pdf] from darkroom.bbfc.co.uk |
The BBFC discussed the classification of strong language at its board meeting in April 2021. The minutes note: The BBFC commissioned Magenta to undertake research into people's views on strong and very strong language in media
content. While the research revealed that usage of bad language, including strong language, has increased among the general population, there remains a desire to protect young people from over-exposure to strong and very strong language.
The findings indicated that people do not wish to see an increase in the allowance of strong language at 12A, or very strong language at 15. Aggravating and mitigating factors were highlighted, and correspond with current BBFC policy.
However, in exceptional circumstances there is some increased allowance for isolated or infrequent use of 'motherfucker' at 12A. The research also indicated that people prefer to be warned of spoken language as opposed to bleeped
strong language, so BBFC short ratings info policies will be updated to accommodate this (e.g. if a work contains a bleeped use of 'fuck', but also a use of 'prick', short Ratings Info (RI) will read moderate bad language'). The
research also indicated that acronyms (e.g. WTF) are generally understood by what word is being implied, and so should be treated as if the word is being spoken, unless there are sufficient mitigating factors to defend the acronym at a lower level.
The research also looked at reclaimed use of 'nigger', typically written as 'nigga', when used between members of the black community in a peer-to-peer context. There was some recognition that the term, when used in this context, was
not the same as the racist iteration of the word, and nor was it the same as 'bad language/swearing'. The BBFC is therefore trialling racial language in short RI where this word is a category defining issue, but will look to the upcoming discrimination
research to further develop our understanding. |
|
|