17th June | | |
Amnesty International falls for trafficking hype
| Based on article
from news.stv.tv See also Report Summary [pdf] from
amnesty.org.uk
|
A new report by Amnesty International (and amongst others, nutters from Poppy) has revealed that no one has ever been convicted for human trafficking in Scotland, despite dozens of arrests of people in connection with prostitution. Two years ago,
35 people were arrested during raids in which 15 suspected trafficked women were discovered. However, the report, Wrong Kind Of Victim? , says: Of the 35 who were arrested, 18 were convicted but for offences related to immigration or
prostitution. [Presumably because they weren't actually being coerced, but were working consensually and had taken liberties with prostitution law and immigration procedures] The rather selective human rights
organisation has now called for closer examination of the reasons behind Scotland's failure to secure any trafficking convictions. Amnesty's Scotland programme director, John Watson, said more than 100 people were convicted of trafficking in England and
Wales. The UK-wide report said measures to protect victims of people smuggling are not fit for purpose and accused the British Government of breaching its obligations under European law to protect trafficked people and uphold minimum
standards of care. The report recommends that information-sharing protocols between the UK's police and law enforcement agencies be developed to improve the likelihood of securing convictions of traffickers in Scotland. And the Scottish
Government should establish protocols with the UK Government to collect and publish data on the extent of human trafficking north of the border. The organisation also called for the provision of safe accommodation and support for trafficked people
across Scotland.
|
8th June | |
| US court case examines patent claims for prostate massager
| Based on article from
chron.com |
A Houston inventor whose medical device turns out to have more market value as an adult sex toy was in federal court fighting against what he claims are sex toy knockoffs. Our business took a major detour when men started using our prostate
massager for recreational purposes, said Amy Sung, executive director of High Island Health. The product in question is called a Pro-State massager on the company's medical website, which features a happy-looking, fully dressed middle-aged
couple and promises better health. Massager starter kits start out at $78.50. The massager is also called Aneros on the company's adult novelty website, which features younger naked people and promises great orgasms. That starter kit goes for
$49.95 with the slogans: The sex toy that's good for you. Takashima and High Island have sued British company Libertybelle Marketing, also known as Pleasure2Me, and others claiming infringement of the 1998 patent of the plastic massager
designed to massage a man's prostate without the use of electrical power. The design was intended to relieve fluid congestion, but it apparently does more than that for some. She said he's in court because he feels the copies have cheapened his
work and also might be dangerous because they aren't carefully crafted. Houston lawyer Charles Rogers was in court defending Libertybelle and others by attacking in preliminary motions whether Takashima's patent was ever properly approved and ever
specific enough to be patentable. Rogers said his clients have not infringed on Takashima's work in any way.
|
18th May | | |
Glasgow council 'shocked' by nudity at lap dancing club
| Based on article
from heraldscotland.com
|
Mean minded licensing chiefs in Glasgow have secured a legal victory over a lap-dancing chain in a ruling that could have ramifications for the entertainment and leisure industry throughout Scotland. In what was viewed as the first real test in
the courts of Scotland's new liquor laws, Glasgow Sheriff Court threw out an attempt by Spearmint Rhino to overturn a decision from last year against it getting a licence. The decision, which was made by Sheriff Craig Scott, will send shockwaves
through the licensed trade and local authorities. It effectively gives licensing boards carte blanche to determine how venues are run, and gives them more power than they have had in more than 35 years. Spearmint Rhino, based on Glasgow's Drury
Street and now called Platinum Lace, is expected to appeal to the Court of Session but will keep on trading for the moment as allowed in the previous licensing laws. Glasgow Licensing Board heard how CCTV footage showed two dancers at Spearmint
Rhino stripped naked, breaching repressive local policies. Fun prevention officers also witnessed several dancers making considerable contact with patrons while performing. In addition, an employee was alleged to have exposed her breasts while
handing out flyers in Glasgow city centre. The application was refused as it was supposedly inconsistent with the licensing objectives of preventing crime and disorder, and protecting and improving public health. The premises were considered
unsuitable for the use of alcohol , the board said. Brightcrew, the licence holder for the club's owners, argued in court that the board had introduced a non-statutory basis for the decision, insisting it should be concerned only with
issues directly related to the sale of alcohol. But Sheriff Scott, who ruled against Glasgow's refusal of a lap-dancing application at a court hearing several years ago, ruled that under the Licensing (Scotland) Act 2005 boards are required to set
out policies and objectives which are very broad in nature . He said that Glasgow was entitled to refuse a licence if it felt an application was inconsistent with those objectives. However, he disagreed that the club was unsuitable for the
use of alcohol.
|
16th May | | |
Best Film
| See article from
erotic-awards.co.uk
| Congratulations to the makers of Uncle
David
UK film directed by Gary Reich, Mike Nicholls and David Hoyle, the film has only two characters: the charming David Hoyle and the gorgeous Ashley Ryder. Their improvised dialogue works, the setting is creepy, the sex warm, kinky and
intimate, the landscape unexpected for nude gallivanting, and the plot totally scary.
Runner Up: Honey Bunny
This bright tongue-in-cheek US film, directed by Vena Virago, is a three-fold project: an art exhibit that serves as a porn set; a DVD release; and an experiment video collaboration with 13 other artists. The porn film is funky,
realistic and features romping sex.
Runner Up: Handcuffs Spanish film written and directed by Erika Lust and photographed by Gustavo López Mañas, It's very short but
blisteringly hot, non-explicit but visually compelling. This is partly thanks to the dashing slick operator male actor who is obviously oh!-so capable of capturing women's lust (so sadly lacking in most sex movies) and the women submit to him
beautifully.
|
15th May | |
| Dr Petra's Blog
| See article from
erotic-awards.co.uk See also www.drpetra.co.uk
|
Congratulations to Dr Petra
Innovative and outreaching, intelligent and entertaining and becoming more and more authoritative. In fact, despite being about sex, it's been named as one of the Top Ten Bloggers of the Year 2008 by The Pod Delusion. Petra's
blog discusses the sexual issues on the current news agenda in a supportive way. It is regularly updated with interviews, clippings, advice and really great links.
|
4th May | | |
Restricting lap dancing in Scotland
| Based on article from
thescotsman.scotsman.com
|
On 13 April 2010, the Justice Committee from the Scottish Parliament decided to issue a call for evidence for
amendment 516 [pdf] which equates lap dancing licensing with that of sex shops. The amendment
was put forward by Sandra White MSP (SNP) for Glasgow. Amendment 516 changes the 1982 Civic Government (Scotland) Act
of control of sex shops. The original act states that local authorities can decide how many sex shops can be in their authority and that the potential sex shops must advertise their intention to apply for a license. The effect that this has
had is that some local authorities rejecting all applications for a sex shop license. In Glasgow, for example, the guidance notes for sex shop applications reads:
Be advised that, in the past, applications for a sex shop licence have been refused on the grounds that the committee felt that the number of sex shops for the locality (ie. Glasgow) should be nil.
It's also worth noting that the licence costs £12,000+. The Scottish Parliament's justice committee will consider the plan this week. Glasgow Council's Community and Safety Services arm has urged MSPs to accept White's
amendment, saying lap-dancing was a form of violence against women . The letter said: Intelligence would suggest that these venues are in fact linked to, and part of, the sex industry and selling of sexual services does occur in some clubs.
The council said the current licensing regime was ineffective , and added local authorities must have the option to refuse to license such establishments . The bid is reported to have backing from Scottish Women's Aid, the Scottish
Coalition Ag-ainst Sexual Exploitation, and Scottish Women's Convention. Councillor Jim Coleman, acting head of the council, said: We view lap-dancing as a form of sexual exploitation which degrades women and also contributes to public nuisance
problems.
|
20th April | |
| UK lap dancing clubs to argue for the right to run their businesses without interference from moralistic whingers
| Based on article from
guardian.co.uk
|
Lap dancing clubs could use the Human Rights Act to oppose legislation allowing councils greater freedom to turn down lap-dancing licence applications, venue owners say. The Policing and Crime Act forces existing lap-dancing clubs to apply for new
licences and allows councils to close venues for moralistic reasons. Chris Knight, president of the Lap-Dancing Association (LDA), said clubs could take their appeals to the European Court of Justice. If local authorities don't give us new
licences, they are effectively taking away our right to property and to do business, as outlined in the Human Rights Act, and we will consider taking it as far as we have to in the courts, he said. Local councils are likely to vigorously
defend the legislation. Richard Kemp, vice-chairman of the Local Government Association (LGA), said: If they want a legal showdown, then we're going to test the depths of their pockets, because we're certainly going to test ours. Club
owners argue that the legislation could infringe their right to property protection. The issue involves article 8 of the Human Rights Act which concerns the right to protection of private property, and activities pursuant to that property, said
licensing lawyer Richard Arnot. If an existing lap-dancing licence is your property, then you have the right to run a lap-dancing club, and the new legislation is arguably an infringement of that right. Julian Skeens, head of licensing law
at Jeffrey Green Russell and the LDA's solicitor, said appeal cases were likely to take a long time, and clubs could remain in business for some time. The situation has angered nutter groups that pushed for the new law. Anna van Heeswijk,
campaigns co-ordinator of Object, said: Human rights legislation exists to safeguard against discrimination and to promote principles of local democracy, not to protect the rights of club owners to make a profit.
|
16th April | | |
Scottish amendment to restrict both lap dancing clubs and private sex with one's own partner
| Thanks to Becky of CAAN Scotland
|
On 13 April 2010, the Justice Committee from the Scottish Parliament decided to issue a call for evidence for
amendment 516 [pdf] which equates lap dancing licensing with that of sex shops. The amendment
was put forward by Sandra White MSP (SNP) for Glasgow. The amendment is one of several hundred put forward to the Criminal Justice and Licensing
Bill , which also contains the extreme pornography law and amendment relating to the criminalising the purchasing of sexual services. Amendment 516 changes the
1982 Civic Government (Scotland) Act of control of sex shops. The original act states that local authorities can
decide how many sex shops can be in their authority and that the potential sex shops must advertise their intention to apply for a license. The effect that this has had is that some local authorities rejecting all applications for a sex shop license. In
Glasgow, for example, the guidance notes for sex shop applications reads: Be advised
that, in the past, applications for a sex shop licence have been refused on the grounds that the committee felt that the number of sex shops for the locality (ie. Glasgow) should be nil.
It's also worth noting that the licence
costs £12,000+. Glasgow in particular has had a long history of making life difficult for adult entertainment venues and it should come of no surprise that Sandra
White had spoken out against lap dancing clubs in the past . Opponents of lap dancing issued a £7000
report by Julie Bindel in 2004 to prove lap dancing was bad. But in the past, Glasgow's prejudices did not seem to affect
other cities, such as Edinburgh. This new amendment will drag all of Scotland into Glasgow's sex-negative way of life .
What is most disturbing about the lap dancing amendment is that, like so many other laws, it is so poorly written that it could potentially extend beyond its original intent. Sandra White and Glasgow Council are quite obviously dead against adult
entertainment venues. But this law could potentially call your own bedroom an adult entertainment venue! In the amendment, an adult entertainment venue is defined as any premises, vehicle, vessel or stall used for a business with an audience of one
or more that any live performance or display of nudity (which includes breasts on a woman or pubic area on either sex) that is provided solely or principally for the purpose of sexually stimulating any member of the audience . Where this gets
tricky is the little bits of (whether by verbal or other means) and ignoring financial gain. Women taking their clothes off and dancing in an erotic way in front of a paying audience of men is the target. Ideally, I should be able to
put on a strip show for my partner in the comfort of my own home. But is this allowed here? I'm not doing it for money, but we are ignoring financial gain . I'm only doing it for my partner, but audience includes an audience of one . I'm
doing it in my own home, but the location is any premises. In other words, every time I expose my breasts to my partner, I would be committing a crime under this law. Even worse, I can't even verbally describe an erotic fantasy or read a published
(and wholly legal) erotic story to my partner because it would count as a live performance of the verbal kind that is sexually stimulating. Another bit of brilliant legislation from the Scottish Government in an effort to stop people from enjoying
sex. This news has been brought to you by CAAN Scotland.
|
|
|