|
Padmavati set to be passed U/A by the Indian film censor once cuts have been implemented
|
|
|
| 31st December 2017
|
|
| See article from thehindu.com
|
The controversial film Padmavati has been granted a U/A certificate by India's Central Board Of Film Certification. U/a allows children to view the film if accompanied by adults. The certificate is dependent on cuts being made which the CBFC
claims are 'modifications'. The 'modifications' include a re-titling, most likely Padmavat , as this apparently changes the name from an historical character to a fictional character. Amother key modification suggestion is the insertion
of disclaimers, specially one regarding not glorifying the practice of Sati. There will relevant 'modifications' in the Ghoomar song to 'befit' the character portrayed. The certificate, as per procedure, will be issued once the required 'modifications'
are carried out and the final material is submitted to the CBFC. CBFC chairman Prasoon Joshi says the reports of 26 cuts, appearing in a section of media, are incorrect. They must have counted the incorrect spellings of some locations for which
changes had been suggested, he clarified, adding, There are no cuts, only modifications. The modification details and the CBFC's decision have been shared with the producers--Viacom 18 Motion Pictures. According to the CBFC, they were in agreement
with the modifications. |
|
Singapore considers giving more film censors powers to smash down doors in the pursuit of films or videos transgressing censorship rules
|
|
|
| 23rd December 2017
|
|
| See article from straitstimes.com
|
Fifty film-makers In Singapore have signed call for the authorities to reconsider proposed changes to the Films Act. A key concern is the expanded powers that film censors of the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) will have in investigating
breaches. Currently, only a few IMDA officers - a censor, a deputy or assistant censor, or an inspector of films - can enter premises without a warrant, and conduct search and seizure over unlawful films, such as obscene or party political films,
the paper noted. With the changes, these powers extend to any classification or licensing officer, who may enter property by breaking doors and windows, and may do so in investigating any breach of the Films Act - not just over unlawful films.
IMDA have claimed its officers have to act quickly to secure evidence of the contraventions while minimising the chances of the suspected offender fleeing the scene. It added that its enforcement officers are adequately trained to carry out
investigations in a way that stands up to scrutiny in a court of law. Public consultation on the proposed changes is due to end on Dec 30 after two extensions. But the 50 film-makers called on IMDA to extend the consultation by another four weeks.
Other proposed amendments include a new scheme allowing some video companies to classify video titles up to a PG13 rating, and a new video games class licence. Another proposed change gives the government minister responsible for media sole
discretion - after consulting a panel - over the outcome of appeals for films that are refused classification for undermining national security. Film-makers want the current framework retained - where appeals are made to a Films Appeal Committee,
consisting of citizens. |
|
|
|
|
| 23rd December 2017
|
|
|
A few previously missing frames from the ripping apart of Frank turn up in a 2017 Blu-ray release in Germany See article from movie-censorship.com
|
|
Indian film censors prevaricate over Padmavati by proposing a panel of historians to determine historical accuracy
|
|
|
| 21st December 2017
|
|
| See article from ndtv.com
|
India's Central Board of Film Certification is set to appoint a panel of historians to watch the controversial movie Padmavati, after the makers of the movie stated that it was partially based on historical facts. The film will now be scrutinised for
(partial?) historical authenticity. The movie has been dogged by protests by some fringe Hindutva outfits which claim it was insulting to Rajput pride. Several politicians then weighed in saying they won't allow the release of the movie in
Rajasthan. Even by conservative estimates the film won't be certified before the second week of January. I don't think they can release the film before March or April. That is, provided the CBFC clears the film without any objection, the source
said. |
|
Warner Brothers win appeal to the MPAA for a PG-13 rating for their latest Clint Eastwood film
|
|
|
| 20th December 2017
|
|
| 6th December 2017. See article [pdf] from filmratings.com
|
The 15:17 To Paris is a 2018 USA drama by Clint Eastwood. Starring Jenna Fischer, Judy Greer and Jaleel White.
American soldiers discover a terrorist plot on a Paris-bound train.
The Warner Bros film was originally submitted to the MPAA in December 2017 and was rated R for a sequence of violence and bloody images. The distributors successfully appealed to the CARA Appeals Board, and got the rating
changed to PG-13 for bloody images, violence, some suggestive material, drug references and language. |
|
Cinemas to return to Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
| 12th
December 2017
|
|
| See article from abcnews.go.com
|
Cinemas are set to open in Saudi Arabia in March 2018 for the first time since they were banned in in the early 1980s, according to the Saudi minister of culture. Cinemas existed in Saudi Arabia until they were banned in the early 1980s after a
puritanical religious establishment gained control over social and educational affairs in the country. Today, the organized Islamist undercurrents that thrived in the 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s no longer have quite so much influence in the
country. A multimillion-dollar DVD bootleg industry flourished as a result of the cinema ban. Saudis amassed large collections of pirated DVDs of the latest Hollywood blockbusters, circumventing both the ban and censorship. It's this revenue that
the decision today also aims to recapture. Opening cinemas will act as a catalyst for economic growth and diversification, said Minister of Culture Awwad Alawwad. By developing the broader cultural sector, we will create new employment and
training opportunities, as well as enriching the kingdom's entertainment options The Saudi cinema industry is still nascent but has been receiving more attention over recent years with breakthrough movies like Wadjdah and Barakah meets
Barakah. It's a beautiful day in Saudi Arabia! tweeted Haifaa al-Mansour the first female Saudi director of a feature film, the acclaimed Wadjda. The announcement by the ministry of culture did not specify whether seating in
cinemas would be gender-segregated as most public spaces are in Saudi Arabia or how heavily censored movies will be. Films are usually greatly censored with pixelation added to cover the chest and legs of actresses. Censorship rules are expected to be
announced in the coming weeks. Multiple malls currently being built had already received licenses to build multiplexes before today's announcement. |
|
Justice League has been banned by Lebanon as Wonder Woman is unwelcome in the country
|
|
|
| 7th December 2017
|
|
| 1st December 2017. See article from
bleedingcool.com |
Justice League is a 2017 USA action Sci-Fi fantasy by Zack Snyder. Starring Ben Affleck, Gal Gadot and Jason Momoa.
Fueled by his restored faith in humanity and inspired by Superman's selfless
act, Bruce Wayne enlists the help of his new found ally, Diana Prince, to face an even greater enemy. Together, Batman and Wonder Woman work quickly to find and recruit a team of met humans to stand against this newly awakened threat. But despite the
formation of this unprecedented league of heroes; Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Cyborg and The Flash, it may already be too late to save the planet from an assault of catastrophic proportions. Last year, Lebanon banned the Wonder Woman
movie because its star, Gal Gadot, had served in the Israeli forces under the country’s national service. Gadot's two years of service coincided with the 2006 war between Israel and Lebanon, one of many wars and conflicts the bitter rivals have been
involved in over the decades.
With Justice League , also starring Gal Gadot in the same role, opening in local cinemas on Thursday, activists want the government to do the same. Activist Pierre Abi Saab has accused the promoters of the
film of ignoring Lebanese laws that he said outlaw all forms of normalisation of ties with Israel. It has now been reported that this campaign has been successful and that, yes, Justice League has been officially banned in Lebanon.
Update: Ramallah 7th December 2017 See article from jpost.com Palestine Cinema
Tower, Palestinians' largest film distributor, banned the film Justice League in Ramallah for violating censorship rules. The decisions was made after local protest was sparked by a viral campaign built all in Arabic focusing on Israeli actress
Gal Gadot's nationality and role as Wonder Woman. It is not yet clear whether the ban will extend to other cities in Palestine. |
|
Another Indian film becomes the focus for religious violence
|
|
|
| 6th December 2017
|
|
| See article from freethinker.co.uk See
article from timesofindia.indiatimes.com
|
Back in 1992, Hindu fanatics numbering 150,000 demolished the 16th-century Babri Mosque in the city of Ayodhya because the site was considered by some to be Ram Janmabhoomi, the actual birthplace of the god Rama. The demolition resulted in several months
of intercommunal rioting between India's Hindu and Muslim communities, causing the death of at least 2,000 people. The incident inspired Indian movie director Sunil Singh, above, to make a movie called Games of Ayodhya , due for release on
December 8 -- and zealots now want him dead. His home in Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, was vandalised by right-wing Hindu activists on Sunday and Yogesh Varshney, city president of Hindu Jagran Manch in Aligarh said that they would not allow the movie,
which narrates a love story between a Hindu man and a Muslim woman in Ayodhya at the time of Babri Masjid demolition, to be released in the city. He said: Today we have blackened the wall of Singh's house. If he
doesn't back down, we will kill him.
One activist announced a bounty for chopping the arms of the director whilst another has gone a step ahead and offered a reward to anyone who beheads the director. The movie was originally
banned by the film censors of the CBFC, but was later cleared by the Film Cerification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT). |
|
UK caste group urges the BBFC to find the 'right' historians who can watch the film Padmavati and stop the character assassination of Indian icons.
|
|
|
| 4th December 2017
|
|
| See article from magtheweekly.com |
Padmavati is a 2017 India historical romance by Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Starring Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor.
Rani Padmavati (aka Padmini) is said to be one of the most beautiful women to
ever exist. This real life story is epitome of Love and sacrifice between Rajput Queen Padmavati and Rana Rawal Ratan Singh, the Rajput ruler of Mewar. Their perfect life took unfortunate turn when Allauddin Khilji's lustful eyes gazed upon Queen
Padmavati. Alauddin Khilji is known as one of the most brutal rulers of the Khilji dynasty, who ascended the throne by killing his father-in-law, his brother-in-laws and their uncles. He was known for attacking states, only for their land and women. And,
the motive behind the attack on Mewar was none other than royal Rani Padmavati. Chittorgarh fort, today, stands as an epitome of the true Rajputana spirit, loyalty, fidelity and bravery and a symbol of women power.
Rajput is an hindu
caste of India, and Rajput Samaj of UK is a London based group of made up from the local community of the Indian caste. The group seems somewhat offended by the movie Padmavati and have started a move to try and ensure that the movie is not
screened in the UK. They are at pains to mention that they will be expressing their views only through peaceful means, rather hinting that an expectation of recourse to violence is not far below the surface. The Rajput Samaj of UK wrote to the
BBFC pointing out that Padmavati is a revered figure in India and that she represented national pride, rather like the figure of King Arthur in Britain. The Samaj claimed in its letter that the directors of the film had tried to glorify Alauddin Khilji
and that such efforts were similar to glorifying ISIS terrorists. They went on to add We must stand up against the glamorisation of plundering, looting, and other barbaric acts, rather in keeping with the extremist view in India that sees its Muslim
rulers who ruled for well-nigh 800 years, as plunderers and looters. It urged BBFC to find the right historians who can watch the film and stop the character assassination of Indian icons. ...Read the
article from magtheweekly.com for perhaps the best understanding for Brits about what is essentially an Indian argument.
|
|
New Zealand film censor publishes its annual report noting that 'banned' is its most common rating
|
|
|
| 30th November
2017
|
|
| See
article from classificationoffice.govt.nz See
article [pdf] from classificationoffice.govt.nz
|
The New Zealand media censors at the Office or Film and Literature Classification have just released their annual report. It includes the interesting observation that its 'banned' category is the most common category used in the year under review:
The most common classification in the last financial year was objectionable, meaning banned. This is a result of a large increase in material being submitted by enforcement agencies. This has coincided with a decrease in
commercial submissions. Along with films, DVD/Blu-rays and games, the Classification Office classifies a variety of material, including computer files submitted by enforcement agencies like Customs, Police, and the Department of
Internal Affairs. In fact computer files make up the great majority of material banned by the Classification Office. Most of these publications were banned for promoting or supporting the sexual exploitation of children and young people.
Apart from that the New Zealand again has a knock at the government for not giving the censors remit over content streamed online: It is now more important than ever that New Zealanders have the tools and
information to allow everyone to take advantage of the freedom and opportunity the digital revolution represents -- while being smart about managing the downsides. Regulation is lagging behind -- our system does not recognise the
changes in the way New Zealanders now consume media. New Zealanders have increasingly borne the consequences of a confusing and out of date approach. The evidence is mounting about the impacts of consuming violent and graphic media, and technology keeps
raising the stakes -- virtual reality and immersive media are now making an impact.
|
|
Egyptian police enforce ban on movie thriller set in Egypt
|
|
|
| 30th November 2017
|
|
| See article from thestar.com
|
The Nile Hilton Incident is a 2017 Sweden / Denmark / Germany / France crime thriller by Tarik Saleh. Starring Fares Fares, Mari Malek and Yasser Ali Maher.
Set against the backdrop of the Egyptian Revolution, the thriller features a police officer who investigates the murder of a woman. What initially seems to be a killing of a prostitute turns into a more complicated case involving the
very elite of Egypt. Egyptian police raided a tiny alternative film venue in Cairo last week to prevent the screening of a thriller critical of law enforcement that has been banned. The officers prevented The Nile Hilton
Incident from being played in a makeshift, 25-seat theatre because it was a downloaded copy that didn't have government permission to be shown. The film, by Swedish-Egyptian director Tarik Saleh, is a murder mystery set in Egypt that addresses
abuse of power and police corruption. It has won several accolades abroad, including the Grand Jury Prize at this year's Sundance Film Festival. But it has not been allowed to screen at either the current festival or November's smaller, Panorama
of the European Film festival, also in Cairo. The ban echoes last year's action against Last Days of the City by Egyptian director Tamer El Said, whose film was feted abroad but blocked from cinemas in Egypt. |
|
The Indian film Padmavati has been delayed from release in India over religious and nationalist controversy. The BBFC passed the film 12A uncut for UK release but violent threat may prove to be a higher authority
|
|
|
| 28th November 2017
|
|
| 21st November 2017. See article from bbc.com |
Padmavati is a 2017 India historical romance by Sanjay Leela Bhansali. Starring Deepika Padukone, Ranveer Singh and Shahid Kapoor.
Rani Padmavati (aka Padmini) is said to be one of the most beautiful women to
ever exist. This real life story is epitome of Love and sacrifice between Rajput Queen Padmavati and Rana Rawal Ratan Singh, the Rajput ruler of Mewar. Their perfect life took unfortunate turn when Allauddin Khilji's lustful eyes gazed upon Queen
Padmavati. Alauddin Khilji is known as one of the most brutal rulers of the Khilji dynasty, who ascended the throne by killing his father-in-law, his brother-in-laws and their uncles. He was known for attacking states, only for their land and women. And,
the motive behind the attack on Mewar was none other than royal Rani Padmavati. Chittorgarh fort, today, stands as an epitome of the true Rajputana spirit, loyalty, fidelity and bravery and a symbol of women power.
Producers of a
Bollywood period epic have indefinitely delayed its release following countrywide protests by Hindu right-wing and caste groups. The epic in Awadhi language extols the virtue of Padmavati who committed sati, the practice of a widow immolating
herself on her husband's funeral pyre, to protect her honour from the invading Muslim emperor Khilji who had killed her husband, the Rajput king, in a battle. Sati is believed to have originated some 700 years ago among the ruling class or Rajputs
in India. The Rajput women burnt themselves after their men were defeated in battles to avoid being taken by the victors. But it came to be seen as a measure of wifely devotion in later years. The custom was outlawed by India's British rulers in 1829
following demands by Indian reformers. Historians point out that Jayasi's epic ballad about a Muslim emperor attacking a kingdom smitten by the beauty of a Hindu queen was written in the 16th Century, more than 200 years after the historical
record of the invasion. They say the folklore around Padmavati have also been problematic as they have glorified sati. Rumours of a scene in the film of the Muslim king dreaming of getting romantic with the Hindu queen enraged many like the Rajput
Karnik Sena, a fringe caste group, who have called for the film to be banned. Director Bhansali has said the film does not feature such dream sequence at all . Last week, the group, which had disrupted the shooting and slapped Bhansali on the set
of the film earlier this year, vandalised cinemas , and threatened to chop off Padukone's nose, referring to a story in the epic Ramayana where a character has her nose chopped off as punishment. Rajput community members have burnt effigies of
Bhansali and sought a ban of the film. Rajasthan Chief Minister Vasundhara Raje has said it should not be released until necessary changes are made so that sentiments of any community are not hurt. A regional leader of the BJP at the weekend
announced a reward of nearly $1.5m for anyone beheading Bhansali and Padukone . Update: BBFC Rating
23rd November 2017. See article from bbfc.co.uk The BBFC has published its rating for the British cinema release of Padmavati. The film is rated 12A
uncut for moderate violence, injury detail. Update: Former Indian film censor claims that the BBFC is acting illegally in passing the film for UK release 24th November 2017 See
article from timesnownews.com
Former Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) chairman Pahlaj Nihalani has claimed that the BBFC decision of certifying the movie Padmavati is illegal. In an interview with ANI, Nihalani said that for a film to get certification overseas, it's
a must that it is passed by the Indian Censor Board. If they've got a thumbs up from Britain without even sending the film, it's against the law. He added that the BBC has no control over the release of an Indian film. If the film is released
outside India, it will eventually be pirated to India, he said. Meanwhile, a petition seeking orders to the makers to not release the film outside India on December 1, has been filed in the Supreme Court. Back home, Padmavati has been
postponed for an indefinite period of time owing to the furious protests against it by the fringe groups - Rajasthan-based Rajput Karni Sena in particular. The groups are protesting an alleged romantic sequence between Padmavati (based on the legend of
Rani Padmini of Chittorgarh) and Mughal Emperor Alauddin Khilji. Some fanatic groups are also incensed with the fact that Rani Padmavati has been shown dancing in the film asserting that Rajput maharanis never danced in front of anyone.
Update: Violent Indian nationalists call for British cinemas to be burnt down 24th November 2017 See
article from independent.co.uk
British cinemas that screen a controversial new Bollywood blockbuster should be burned down, the leader of a hardline Hindu nationalist group has claimed. Members of the Rajput Karni Sena, a group associated with the warrior Rajput caste, claim it
misrepresents history by depicting a love affair between the queen and a Muslim invader. The group is further upset that the queen's midriff is exposed in a song sequence. Now the leader of Rajput Karni Sena, Sukhdev Singh has called for action to
be taken in the UK. He told Republic TV: I call on Hindus in the UK and particularly my community brothers to protest against the screening of the film there. I have told them any cinema hall which screens the movie
will be burnt.
Update: Safety of Paramount concern 28th November 2017 See
article from theguardian.com
British film distributors are reconsidering the release of Padmavati. In the face of the ongoing controversy, the British distributor, Paramount Pictures, said the UK release date was being reviewed, amid reports that producers wanted to clarify the
situation in India before making a decision abroad. It had been due to come out from 1 December. A London-based Hindu campaign group, Rajput Samaj of UK, declared its opposition to the BBFC's decision to certify the film for release and said it
would hold a peaceful protest over what it sees as a historically inaccurate account of Padmini. It told the Guardian that it did not want the film to be released but claimed that it was opposed to any violence. The call from the charity for the
film to lose its certification comes after a fringe rightwing group in India threatened violence if UK cinemas showed the film. The Indian supreme court had agreed to hear a petition next week asking that the film's UK release be banned. Lawyers
said it was unlikely the court could prevent an overseas debut, though the film's producers have already said they would await the Indian censor's approval before distributing the movie worldwide.
Update: UK Courts 28th November 2017 See article from theguardian.com Another UK
group is also attempting to get the UK release banned. The Rajasthan Association asked the BBFC about censoring the film, but the BBFC commendably responded that freedom of choice must be respected and that filmmakers are free to explore narratives based
on historical events and to interpret them as they wish. The Rajasthan Association was now mulling the option of approaching UK court in connection with the matter. |
|
Appeal board overturns the PG rating for Nut Job 2 and replaces it with a general audience G rating
|
|
|
| 27th
November 2017
|
|
| See
article [pdf] from classification.gov.au |
The Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature is a 2017 Canada / USA / South Korea family animation comedy by Cal Brunker. Starring Will Arnett, Katherine Heigl and Maya Rudolph.
Surly and his friends, Buddy, Andie and Precious discover that the mayor of Oakton City is cracking one big hustle to build a giant yet quite-shabby amusement park, which in turn will bulldoze their home, which is the city park, and
it's up to them and the rest of the park animals to stop the mayor, along with his daughter and a mad animal control officer from getting away with his scheme, and take back the park. The Australian Review Board has overturned a PG
rating from the Classification Board and replaced it with a general audience G rating (equivalent to a UK U rating). The Review Board explains: A three-member panel of the Classification Review Board has unanimously
determined that the film Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature is classified G (General) with the consumer advice Some scenes may scare young children. The Classification Guidelines provide that at the G category, violence and the
treatment of themes should have a very low sense of threat or menace, and be justified by context. In the Classification Review Board's opinion Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature warrants a G classification because its violence and
treatment of themes are of a very mild impact. There are numerous scenes of unrealistic, animated violence which are all resolved with positive outcomes for the animals and are interspersed with humour and are relevant to the context. The theme of the
park being destroyed for greed is overall a positive story about animals protecting their habitat and has a very mild sense of threat which is at all times relevant to the context. The Classification Review Board convened today in
response to an application from the original applicant, Roadshow Films to review the decision made by the Classification Board on 18 September 2017 to classify Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature PG with the consumer advice Mild themes and animated violence.
For comparison:
- the UK BBFC rated the film as U uncut for mild comic threat, violence
- the US MPAA rated the film PG for action and some rude humor.
|
|
|
|
|
| 25th November 2017
|
|
|
Fifty years on from the Joyce movie that scandalised the world. By Donal Fallon, author and historian See article from
spiked-online.com |
|
French Senator calls on move makers to drop the iconic cigarette smoking
|
|
|
| 21st November 2017
|
|
| See article from
theguardian.com |
Many stylish and iconic French films have featured smoking, Jean-Paul Belmondo in A? Bout du Souffle Audrey Tautou in Coco Chanel , Jacques Tati was rarely without his pipe and Brigitte Bardot, Jeanne Moreau, Catherine Deneuve , Geard
Depardieu and Alain Delon all puffed their way through decades of movies. Hardly surprising then that a call for French directors to stub out smoking on screen has been greeted with a mix of disbelief and outright ridicule. The debate was
ignited after the Socialist senator Nadine Grelet-Certenais accused France's film-makers of continuing to advertise for the tobacco industry. Her remarks, made during a debate on the government's plan to raise the price of cigarettes and tobacco, sparked
the interest of the health minister, Agnès Buzyn, who said she would talk to her cabinet colleague, the culture minister, Françoise Nyssen. Buzyn promised firm action saying: I don't understand why the cigarette is so
important in French cinema.
|
|
Bus adverts for the movie Jigsaw generate a few complaints for being frightening
|
|
|
| 25th October 2017
|
|
| See article from kentonline.co.uk |
Parents say images promoting a new horror film on the side of buses are too scary for children to see. Posters for Jigsaw have been seen on the side of Stagecoach buses in Kent and around the country, alongside other marketing on television and
online. The bus adverts are based on the Jigsaw poster right. Ashford father-of-two Chris Paine says the image, which depicts a ghoulish serial killer character called Billy the Puppet, is inappropriate for children. He said his daughter saw the
posters when they were leaving the train station. He said: My children are aged 12 and 15 and they just don't watch those sort of films. I really don't think it's appropriate.
The Advertising
Standards Authority (ASA) says it has received 24 complaints about the adverts from across the country, 21 of which are about bus posters. ASA press officer Estelle Yuen said: The nature of complaints have generally been that the imagery is frightening
and unsuitable for public display where children can easily come across them. |
|
Australian Classification Review Board downrates Jigsaw from 18 to 15
|
|
|
| 22nd October 2017
|
|
| See Review
Board decision [pdf] from classification.gov.au |
Jigsaw is a 2017 USA / Canada horror thriller by Michael Spierig and Peter Spierig. Starring Laura Vandervoort, Tobin Bell and Callum Keith Rennie.
Bodies are turning up around the city, each having met
a uniquely gruesome demise. As the investigation proceeds, evidence points to one man: John Kramer. But how can this be? The man known as Jigsaw has been dead for over a decade.
There has been a bit of a buzz that the latest film in
the Saw franchise is perhaps not quite so close to the cutting edge of torture porn. And this has now been confirmed by an appeal against an adults-only R18+ rating from the Australian Censorship Board. The Review Board that heard the appeal have reduced
the R18+ rating to MA15+ which would perhaps be called a 15A in the UK system. The Review Board explained their decision as follows: [ Spoilers! hover or click text below]
The Review Board considered that the film is a horror movie and as such warrants the MA15+ classification for themes and violence. The film has a strong theme of a serial killer seeking to get his
captives to atone for their crimes that they have not acknowledged. The captives face gruesome, torturous deaths if they do not face their crimes. The Review Board considered that the theme is strong and impactful but that this is justified by the
context and can be accommodated at the MA15+ classification. The film contains numerous violent scenes which are in the context of a serial killer's treatment of his captives. Most of the scenes focus on the threat of violence,
such as being dragged by chains towards circular saws, Ann being dragged around the post against the barbed wire, the captives being hung by chains and drawn towards the ceiling, and the tightening of the wires around Ryan's legs. The Review Board
considered that these scenes created a strong impact that could be accommodated at the MA15+ classification. The Review Board particularly noted four violent scenes:
the depiction of 'buckethead' with his bucket removed depicting catastrophic head and face injury resulting from the circular blades as seen in previous scenes and the still shots of his head as the
captives are being hung Ryan stabs Karly in t he neck with the three syringes and this is followed by a depiction of Karly's eyes turning red as the acid enters her body, and close up of her neck bleeding and her body dissolving from the acid. The Review
Board noted that this scene was dimly lit and relatively short -- switching immediately to the setting of the detectives at the mortuary. Mitch is seen being hung over the vortex machine and then being killed by the machine.
The Review Board considered that the violence was implied with no detail of his death. The Review Board noted that Mitch's body falls from the ceiling and there is a brief shot of his mutilated body. The Review Board noted that this was dimly lit and
fleeting scene with immediate cut away to the detectives leaving the building. Ann is seen to try to shoot Ryan but the gun has been set to fire backwards and Ann is shot. There is a depiction of her lying dead, covered in
blood but there is no gunshot wound apparent.
It was the view of the Review Board that these scenes involved horror violence which had a strong impact , but the violent images were justified by the context, fleeting, usually dimly lit and were quickly followed by scenes of the
detectives or Dr Nelson away from the violence. The Review Board considered the violence could be accommodated within the MA15+ classification
For comparison the film is rated 18 for strong bloody violence, injury detail in the UK and rated R for sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, and for language in the US. |
|
Distributor cuts are made for cinema release to avoid nudity being mentioned in the BBFC consumer advice
|
|
|
| 21st October 2017
|
|
| |
Access All Areas is a 2017 UK comedy music drama by Bryn Higgins. Starring Ella Purnell, Georgie Henley and Nigel Lindsay.
An unlikely gang of teens go on the run to an island
music festival, leaving behind their dysfunctional parents and the rules of the real world.
The film was originally for cinema and VoD and was passed 15 uncut for strong sex references, nudity, drug misuse. A few days
later the film was cut and resubmitted by the distributor. This time the film was passed 15 for strong sex references, drug misuse. So presumably the nudity was cut so to avoid it being mentioned in the BBFC aconsumer dvice.
|
|
Director Tyler Perry speaks of cuts for an MPAA PG-13 rating
|
|
|
| 19th October 2017
|
|
| See article from cinemablend.com
|
Boo 2! A Madea Halloween is a 2017 USA comedy horror by Tyler Perry. Starring Tyler Perry, Patrice Lovely and Brock O'Hurn.
Madea, Bam, and Hattie venture to a haunted campground
and the group must run for their lives when monsters, goblins, and the boogeyman are unleashed. The film was cut in the US for an MPAA PG-13 rating for sexual references, drug content, language and some horror images. Director
Tyler Perry said that an earlier submission had resulted in an R rating. He attributed this to Madea's pot-smoking brother, Joe, and his foul language. Perry elaborated: Just language. Joe. Out of control. His language
was just really really rough and in PG you could only really say... they only give you so many curse words if you are going to stay PG-13. That was it, just language.
|
|
Denying Cambodia 'as a place where villains are based who make trouble for the world'...conveniently forgetting about Pol Pot
|
|
|
| 13th
October 2017
|
|
| See article from bbc.com |
Kingsman: The Golden Circle is a 2017 UK / USA action comedy adventure by Matthew Vaughn. Starring Taron Egerton, Colin Firth and Mark Strong.
When the Kingsman headquarters are destroyed and the
world is held hostage, their journey leads them to the discovery of an allied spy organization in the US called Statesman, dating back to the day they were both founded. In a new adventure that tests their agents' strength and wits to the limit, these
two elite secret organizations band together to defeat a ruthless common enemy, in order to save the world, something that's becoming a bit of a habit for Eggsy...
Cambodia has banned the movie Kingsman: The Golden Circle over its
alleged negative portrayal of the country. Bok Borak, from the Ministry of Censorship Culture told The Phnom Penh Post that the film's clear reference to Cambodia as a place where villains are based and make trouble for the world as a major point of
concern. The film chronicles British and American spy organisations teaming up in search of the secret base of a drug lord. Once they find the base, which is a temple surrounded by jungles in Cambodia, a showdown between the two sides ensues.
|
|
US moralists lose no time in trying to blame media violence for gun rampage killings
|
|
|
| 9th October 2017
|
|
| See
article from w2.parentstv.org |
US moralists of the Parents Television Council are calling on Hollywood to take gun violence seriously by evaluating and lowering its use on TV shows and in films. PTC President Tim Winter spouted: We agree with Disney's
Bob Iger that gun violence should be taken seriously, and in that vein, we are calling on the entire entertainment industry to evaluate its own incessant, and ever-more-realistic daily rehearsals of gun violence -- and graphic violence in general -- on
its TV shows and in its movies. Hollywood needs to take seriously its own role in contributing to normalizing violence. Mr. Iger and other industry leaders cannot claim their content does not have real-life impact when their very economic existence is
based on advertising, the sole purpose of which is to change the behavior of each viewer. We urge the entertainment industry to evaluate and ideally lower portrayals of violence and specifically, gun violence.
But before US campaign groups attempt to deflect people away from gun control, perhaps they could take a quick glance towards Europe. Europeans watch pretty much the same amount of violent Hollywood films and TV as American viewers. And
yet suffer vastly less killing from gun rampages. A most cursory correlation of evidence suggestion that many lives are saved in Europe through our stringent gun control laws. |
|
BBFC cut a Canadian comedy drama over child protection concerns
|
|
|
| 8th October 2017
|
|
| |
Prank is a 2016 Canada comedy drama by Vincent Biron. Starring Alexandre Auger, Eric K Boulianne and Normand Daoust.
Stefie, a lonely young boy, is approached by Martin,
Jean-Sé and Lea to record their daily pranks with his cellphone. The four prankmeisters decide to set up an antic that goes beyond anything they've done so far... But who will be the victim? PRANK is a funny and cruel coming-of-age story about
friendship, peer pressure and the loss of innocence.
UK: Passed 15 for strong language, sex references, nudity, drug misuse after 24s of BBFC compulsory cuts for:
The BBFC commented:
- Cuts were required to remove sight of a young child in the same frame as pornographic images playing on a television screen. Cuts required in accordance with the Protection of Children Act 1978.
|
|
India's censor droids show no empathy for the human desire to enjoy a bit of nudity
|
|
|
| 3rd October 2017
|
|
| See article from dnaindia.com |
Blade Runner 2049 is a 2017 UK / USA / Canada Sci-Fi thriller by Denis Villeneuve. Starring Harrison Ford, Ryan Gosling and Ana de Armas.
Thirty years after the events of the first film, a new
blade runner, LAPD Officer K (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former LAPD blade runner who has
been missing for 30 years.
India's film censors at the Central Board Of Film Certification (CBFC) have demanded cuts before granting an adults-only 'A' rating for Blade Runner 2049. All the nude shots, frontal and back have
been deleted. It was pointed out to them that the nudity is computer generated rather than real, but this did not sway the censors. There were also cuts to blur liquor bottles wherever they are shown. |
|
Russian christians still getting wound up by the film Matilda
|
|
|
| 1st October 2017
|
|
| |
The Russian Orthodox Church has erected 300 billboards in Moscow displaying words about love exchanged between the last tsar and his wife. The displays are the latest actions in a campaign trying to get the Russian film, Matilda banned. The film
explores the love affair between Nicholas II and a ballerina. It has wound up the christians because they consider the emperor to be a saint. MP Natalya Poklonskaya is leading the campaign and explains: You can't
touch saints and you can't show them having sex
Violent ctivists have burnt cars outside the offices of the production company and threatened to disrupt screenings. The biggest cinema chain will not show the film to protect
cinemagoers when it opens later this month. |
|
|