25th February | | |
Cartoon likening party policies to concentration camps causes trouble in the Netherlands
| From islamophobia-watch.com
|
The Dutch public broadcaster VARA published a website cartoon which took a pot shot at Geert Wilder's far right PVV party. The cartoon by Adriaan Soeterbroek likened a policy to create hooligan villages to Nazi concentration camps. Wilders was not impressed and said: it was
a disgusting cartoon. It must be removed from that website immediately, or the PVV will not attend the VARA provincial elections debate . The cartoon has now been removed following death threats to staff. The VARA says it removed the
cartoon after careful consideration, saying that while freedom of expression is a key right some of its staff felt too threatened to continue working. The broadcaster has reported the incident to the police.
|
24th February | | |
Norway considers state internet censorship in the name of protecting its monopoly on betting
| From casinoscamreport.com
|
Norway is deciding whether to start ISP blocking of online gambling sites that allow players from their country to gamble on the internet within Norway's borders. The reason for this extreme censorship measure is that it has become apparent that
even though legislation was passed in July of 2010 to block all financial transactions to all offshore gambling sites, players that gamble at these online gaming websites have increased despite the new ban. A survey was taken and the results
showed that about 4% of Norwegians over the age of 18 years old are still gambling at offshore gaming sites. Besides the suggestion to block IP addresses, Norway is also considering taking legal action against operators that still accept players
from Norway. The Culture of Censorship Minister has said that the need to consider filtering IP addresses of online gambling sites may be necessary.
|
17th February | | |
Italian police take down satirical blog about Berlusconi
| From agi.it
|
Italian Postal Police have closed an internet blog after an article was posted on February 4 that stated I want to kill Berlusconi and described the Italian prime minister as a hypnotizing alien. The web master, Valieria Rossi was
questioned by police at the central police station in Savona. The site, savonaponente.com, was blocked and Rossi's computers were confiscated by police. The Bologna public prosecutor ordered the action taken under slander, threats and instigation
to criminal association laws.
|
15th February | | |
Major newspaper takes government to court over unconstitutional media repression
| Based on article from
politics.hu
|
Hungary's largest-circulation national daily has turned to the Constitutional Court over the new media package, the paper said. Editor-in-Chief Karoly T Voros submitted complaints that the legislation curbed press freedom and freedom of opinion in
16 areas, the paper said. Among the complains listed, were the new media authority's supervision over print media, powers to impose fines, regulatory powers over new media, and the requirement that reporting must be balanced in the printed media.
|
15th February | | |
Budapest Gay Pride banned over media law protest
| See
article from
google.com
|
Hungarian police have blocked this year's annual Budapest Gay Pride parade with organisers claiming that it was a politically motivated ban. The Budapest police chief has withdrawn the permission that was granted earlier to the organisers of
the 2011 gay pride march, Sandor Steigler, head of the organising Rainbow Mission Foundation, told AFP. The organisation was preparing a court appeal, he added. Last week, the organisers of the march applied for an extension to their
usual downtown route, which police had earlier accepted. The extension would have taken the march in front of parliament, where marchers planned to protest against Hungary's controversial media law and the upcoming new constitution, both perceived as
detrimental to the cause of gay rights, Steigler said. It was this protest against the repressive new media law that seems to have triggered the Gay Pride ban.
|
15th February | | |
Court case against Geert Wilders has no tenable outcome
| The trial was brought presuming that it against the law to say anything bad about islam full stop. This was found to be untenable under Dutch Freedom of
Expression as one can say bad things if they can be shown to be true. Now of course it will be untenable on politically correctness grounds to actually argue in court about whether islam is bad or not. See
article from bbc.co.uk
|
Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders has been granted the right to challenge the charges against him of inciting hatred. The ruling was made by a new panel of judges appointed after the initial trial collapsed in October when Wilders complained of
bias against him. One of the judges told the court that if the objections were successful, the case will be closed . The charges against him of inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims, Moroccans and other groups date back
to remarks he made in 2006 and 2008. He called Islam fascist and compared the Koran to Hitler's book Mein Kampf. The prosecution told his initial trial last year that the comments were not criminal. The first trial eventually fell
apart when a separate panel decided that the judges' decision not to allow expert witnesses to provide evidence that Islam is in fact a violent religion. This decision was found to be biased against Wilders and a retrial was ordered.
Update: Trial Date 16th February 2011. See article from
islamophobia-watch.com The trial of PVV leader Geert Wilders on discrimination and inciting hatred charges will resume on March 14 when his lawyer Bram Moszkowicz
will restate his opening remarks to the Amsterdam court, news agency ANP reports. The public prosecutor will respond two days later. The court is expected to decide whether the case should continue or be abandoned on March 30.
|
13th February | |
| Nutters rant against right of appeal for websites blocked under new EU proposed law
| See article from
guardian.co.uk
|
The European parliament's civil liberties, justice and home affairs committee (LIBE) will meet in Strasbourg tomorrow, when it is expected to approve a controversial measure that would compel EU member states to inform internet publishers that their
images are to be deleted from the internet or blocked for reasons of child pornography. Publishers will also have to be informed of their right to appeal against any removal or blocking. The measure would make the UK's system for blocking
and removing child pornography without informing the publisher illegal. MEPs seem more concerned with the rights of child pornographers than they do with the rights of children who have been sexually abused to make their foul, illegal images,
said John Carr, the secretary of the Children's Charities Coalition on Internet Safety (And an adviser to the UK government on child internet safety!) Comment: Surely it is non-child porn
publishers that can appeal. If they can show that their sites are legal then it is absolutely correct that they should be able to prove their point. On the other hand, child pornographers would simply have no case on
which to make an appeal, their material is illegal, and will stay removed or blocked.
|
11th February | |
| European Parliament set for first vote on mandatory website blocking
| See article
from europeanvoice.com
|
Cecilia Malmstrom, the European commissioner for home affairs, is worried that MEPs' amendments to a draft directive on the sexual abuse and exploitation of children would make it more difficult for EU member states to block access to websites carrying
child pornography. The European Parliament's civil liberties committee is to vote on the European Commission's proposal and MEPs' amendments on 14th February. At present, it is up to member states whether they want to block websites such
content. The Commission is seeking to introduce an obligation on all member states to block access in cases where their removal is impossible. A majority of member states back the mandatory blocking of internet sites but the measure has run into
trouble with MEPs. Germany, Ireland and Luxembourg have also openly rejected the measure. Some of the hundreds of amendments to the draft regulation put forward by MEPs would introduce EU-wide rules that would make it more difficult for member
states to continue blocking websites. Many MEPs are concerned about the implications of website blocking for freedom of speech. I am a liberal, I consider free speech as a fundamental value and I have fought for that all my life, so accusations
that I'm trying to censor the internet and limit freedom of speech really go to my heart because that is absolutely not what I'm trying to do, Malmstro m said. But I have seen those pictures; they have nothing to do with freedom of speech.
This is a horrible violation. She also rejected the slippery-slope argument -- the notion that once the EU imposed rules on blocking access to one type of website, it could do so for other types in the future. I intend in no way to propose any
other type of blocking for any other thing, but this particular crime demands particular attention.
|
10th February | | |
Bulletstorm cut in Germany
| See article from gamepolitics.com
|
The nutter hyped Bulletstorm has been given a USK 18+ rating by the German Entertainment Software Rating Board. Even with an 18+ rating, the game had to be significantly cut by removing ragdoll physics effects, blood, blood splatter,
and dismemberment. The game was rated M (mature 17+) by the ESRB, the US game ratings organisation. In the UK. the BBFC rated the game 18 uncut with the comment: Contains frequent strong bloody violence and strong
language |
4th February | |
| European Court suggestion that free trade law allows subscription to mainland European TV services
| See article
from guardian.co.uk See also Foreign satellite football: key questions
answered from morningadvertiser.co.uk
|
Pub landlord Karen Murphy is defending her right to show English Premier League matches in her pub using a fully paid up subscription to Greek satellite TV. In a decision that could change the way sports rights are sold across the continent, the
European court of justice was advised that forbidding pubs from buying in cheap football coverage from overseas operators was incompatible with European free trade laws. Murphy was taken to court by a company representing the league over her
decision to import a Greek decoder to show the games rather than paying Sky, which holds the rights in the UK. She has fought the case all the way to the highest European court. Juliane Kokott, one of the eight advocate generals of the European
court of justice, advised that selling on a territory-by-territory basis represented a serious impairment of freedom to provide services , adding that the economic exploitation of the [TV] rights is not undermined by the use of foreign
decoder cards as the corresponding charges have been paid for those cards . Because Murphy had paid the legitimate rights holder in Greece, she was entitled to receive its satellite broadcasts. Whilst those charges are not as high as the
charges imposed in the UK there is ... no specific right to charge different prices for a work in each member state, Kokott said. Selling on a basis of territorial exclusivity was tantamount to profiting from the elimination of the internal market
. Kokott's opinion is not binding, but the Luxembourg court usually follows the advice of advocate generals. The court is expected to deliver its verdict later this year. As well as the criminal case against Murphy, civil cases against two
importers of the decoder cards are being considered in parallel.
|
2nd February | |
| Lars Hedegaard acquitted of hate speech after over generalising about honour crime
| Based on article
from cphpost.dk
|
The president of the Danish Free Press Society has been acquitted on racism charges in something of a show trial. Lars Hedegaard was accused over a statement which was made to a blogger: Girls in Muslim families are raped by their uncles,
their cousins, or their fathers. The court ruled that it does not constitute racism or hate speech explaining that although it found Hedegaard's comments to be insulting, the acquittal was handed down due to the fact that Hedegaard did not
know that his controversial comments would be published. Hedegaard had previously expressed regret for the statements, which were made during a 35-minute interview at a Christmas party with the author of the blog snaphanen.dk. However, he had
maintained that what he said did not constitute racism under the Danish penal code. Hedegaard released a statement following his acquittal. My detractors – the foes of free speech and the enablers of
an Islamic ascendancy in the West – will claim that I was acquitted on a technicality, the statement read. That is absolutely true. However, the public prosecutor has been privy to the circumstances surrounding my case for a year – and yet he
chose to prosecute me. Obviously in the hope that he could secure a conviction given the Islamophile sentiment among our ruling classes. My acquittal is therefore a major victory for free speech.
|
31st January | |
| Sweden proposes law against unauthorised photography
| See article
from thelocal.se
|
The Swedish Ministry of Injustice wants to add unauthorised photographing to the Swedish criminal code. What we're trying to do is come up with laws that make it illegal to take pictures that are clearly meant to be insulting and violate
a person's privacy without criminalizing pictures taken around the table at a dinner party, for example, injustice ministry spokesman Martin Valfridsson told The Local. Injustice ministry officials have been wrestling with a workable
formulation for legislation to prohibit the practice since 2008. The original proposal only covered pictures taken in people's homes, and after a flood of negative comments, the ministry decided to rework the proposal entirely. Under the latest
proposal, people would be punished with fines or up to a year in prison for taking pictures that constitute an intrusion in the private sphere which individuals ought to be guaranteed against other individuals. Furthermore, the new statute would
outlaw picture taking that irrespective of place, occurs in a way which is obtrusive, intrusive, or hidden and that is meant to be a serious violation of a person's privacy as an individual. The proposal also tries to take the work of
journalists into account, providing an exception to the prohibition of photographing people in sensitive situations if a reporter is trying to show that a public figure is doing something inappropriate. Despite the exemption, the chair of Sweden's
main journalists union, Journalistförbundet, slammed the new proposal, arguing it risked putting restrictions on working journalists. The proposal is sloppy and poorly defined, which is bad when it actually deals with freedom of speech, which is one
of our core values, Agneta Lindblom Hulthén told the TT news agency.
|
29th January | | |
Swedish fine reduced for possession of manga images of children
| See
article from
monstersandcritics.com
|
A Swedish appeals court has ruled that a translator of Japanese cartoons had violated a ban against possession of child pornography, upholding a previous conviction. The translator had appealed a district court ruling from June that his
collection, included images that violated a 1999 law. The law that bans possession or production of child pornography covers all images, including drawings, the appeals court said. The law was tightened last year making it an offence to view child
pornographic images for instance on the internet. However, the court lowered the fines issued by a district court from 25,000 kronor (£2,400) to 5,600 kronor (£540) . The case has generated debate on social media sites and among fans of the
Japanese cartoon-style who argued that freedom of speech protected the man's right to keep the images. Meanwhile the National Library Considers its Collection See
article from thelocal.se Sweden's National Library has sought guidance from the government after determining that 21 magazines in its collection feature child pornography.
We want to know if we should allow them to be available for viewing for research purposes, and if so, how we should determine who should be allowed to see them, Communications Director Urban Rybrink told The Local. At the moment these are
locked up and inaccessible pending guidance from the government. The collection at the library was built up in the years between 1971, when the possession, distribution and display of child pornography was legalized in Sweden, until 1980,
when the law was repealed. Rybrink explained that the library is tasked with maintaining a copy of all printed material published in Sweden.
|
28th January | |
| Political pressures lead to a German block on a Turkish film said to show Israel in a bad light
| 27th January 2011. See article from
spiegel.de |
The Turkish film series Valley of the Wolves is not known for its delicacy. Now, distribution of the most recent movie in the series has been blocked in Germany. The Valley of the Wolves formula is simple: Turks are honorable and
courageous; action hero Polat Alemdar, played by Turkish movie star Necati Amazbased, can do no wrong; Americans are suspect; and Israelis are inhuman and brutal. The newest installment, Valley of the Wolves Palestine, is based on the
Israeli attack on the Mavi Marmara, the Turkish aid ship carrying pro-Palestinian activists to Gaza in May 2010, which resulted in the deaths of nine Turks on board the ship. Of particular political concern are allegations that Israel and Israelis
are portrayed negatively in the film. Furthermore, the planned release date of Jan. 27, which is International Holocaust Remembrance Day, is seen as insensitive. To release a film like this on such an important day of remembrance is beyond
tasteless and insensitive to the feelings of the victims, said German parliamentarian Philipp Missfelder, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrats (CDU). Kerstin Griese, a German parliamentarian with the center-left Social
Democrats, called the movie problematic, because it glorifies violence and anti-Israeli sentiment. This has proven too much for Germany's film censorship board, the FSK which has so far refused to grant the film an age rating certificate,
which automatically places it in the adult category. German law forbids adult-rated films from being marketed using posters and other forms of public advertising. The film board will meet again on Thursday to review the decision.
Update: Passed 18 28th January 2011. Based on article from
jpost.com
Germany's FSK film censors passed Turkish film Kurtlar Vadisi: Filistin (Valley of the Wolves: Palestine) with an adults only rating. The distribuotrs, Pera, said that it can be shown immediately but it wasn't immediately clear that it was
shown on Thursday – International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Austrian cinemas did show show it on the day as planned with a self imposed 18 rating.. FSK issued a statement saying that children under the age of 18 are not permitted to see the
film. They added that Valley of the Wolves contains propaganda tendencies and repetitive violence. The film cost $10 million to make, making it the most expensive in Turkish cinematic history. Politicians
from the Green Party and the Christian Social Union criticized the film this week. Philipp Missfelder, a member of the ruling Christian Democratic Party, said it disrespects victims of the Holocaust, and Jerzy Montag of the Green Party called the movie
irresponsible.
|
27th January | | |
Sex education under the cosh in Sweden because one person complained to the police about the morality of animated teen sex
| Another example that shows a nutter complaining to the police is afforded more credibility than an entire team of sex educationalists, TV makers and
lawyers. See article from thelocal.se
|
Animated teen sex scenes in a sex education film has led to the film being reported to the police for violating laws against endangering the moral upbringing of young people. The film, Sex on the map (Sex på kartan) , was co-produced
by the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education (RFSU) and the Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company (UR) and broadcast last week on Sveriges Television (SVT). One individual then reported the public broadcaster to the police. According to
the complaintant, the film depicts minors having sex and is directed toward Swedish high school students and thus qualifies as the crime of leading youth astray. According to the statute, someone can be convicted of the crime for
distributing pictures or images featuring content which can be dehumanising or otherwise cause serious danger for the moral upbringing of young people. Cecilia Bäcklander, the programme director rejected the claims: This is a very well
thought out film that has been planned for several years with RFSU. We're not guilty of endangering young people or leading them astray. This is an educational film . We've consulted our lawyers throughout the production . The
complaint, which was filed with the police in Stockholm, has been forwarded to Sweden's Chancellor of Justice (Justitiekanslern), who is charged with assessing whether or not the matter falls within the framework of Sweden's laws governing freedom of
expression.
|
21st January | | |
France to excuse 'cultural heritage' from ban on the promotion of smoking
| See article from smh.com.au
|
French MPs have voted to overturn rules that resulted in legendary comedian Jacques Tati losing his beloved pipe and existentialist writer Jean-Paul Sartre ditching his trademark cigarette. A parliamentary commission voted for a bill that would
exclude cultural heritage from the stringent health legislation passed in 1991 that forbids direct or indirect promotion of smoking. Last year posters for a Tati retrospective in Paris showed the late actor and director with his pipe replaced by a
yellow toy windmill. Critics slammed the poster as an overdose of political correctness. The cultural affairs committee almost unanimously backed the bill, which must now go before parliament, that would exclude cultural heritage from the
anti-smoking law.
|
19th January | | |
Dead Space 2 game cut for a delayed German release
| Based on article from
ripten.com
|
The German release of Dead Space 2 has been delayed until February. The delay was caused by censorship issues as the game had to be cut to keep the German authorities happy. The friendly fire option has been removed from
the multiplayer portion of the game. Apparently, the German government was uneasy with a player killing their own teammates. Thankfully the single player portion of the title will remain unaltered. Producers Electronic Arts said in a
translated press release that the game will be released on 03:02:11 for PS3 and Xbox 360 only. The Wii release still seems mired in censorship difficulties and will not get released at this time.
|
19th January | | |
Hungary's immoral media law is unbalancing the EU
| See article from
theregister.co.uk by Jane Fae Ozimek
|
The EU''s Digital agenda commissioner Neelie Kroes told an Extraordinary meeting of the European Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee that the EU had been in touch with the Hungarian government and had deep concerns about the
nature of a new media law, which came into force on 1 January 2011. The law made those responsible for material published in Hungary - both through traditional channels and online - subject to heavy fines and sanctions if their coverage is deemed
to be unbalanced or immoral . Kroes said that in addition to writing to the Hungarian authorities in December, raising specific concerns regarding their compliance with the EU AVMS Directive, she has also visited Budapest to discuss the
matter. She believes that the Media Law may risk jeopardising fundamental rights in a number of ways, including its requirement that all media - including online media such as forums and blogs - be registered, and by making the Media Authority subject to
political control through the appointment process. The Media Law seems to raise a problem under the AVMS Directive because its provisions appear to apply also to media firms established in other Member States, which would be contrary to the
country of origin principle, she said. ...Read the full article Update: Promises 6th February 2011.
See article from
google.com The European Union said on Tuesday that Hungary had given a clear indication it could change a hotly-contested media law that is embarrassing the bloc as it
seeks to promote democratic standards elsewhere. A spokesman for Neelie Kroes, vice-president of the executive European Commission charged with defusing a row that has overshadowed Budapest's six-month chairmanship of the 27-state grouping, said
she had received a reply to queries raised with the Hungarian government. Jonathan Todd said she had detected a clear indication in today's letter that they are prepared to modify the law if need be and that her staff were eager to
quickly discuss technical aspects... as soon as possible.
|
18th January | | |
Sculpture depicting pissing policewoman winds up the German authorities
| Thanks to Nick Based on article from
artthreat.net
|
Marcel Walldorf's life-size sculpture of a policewoman in full riot gear pissing on the floor has some Germans pissed . The sculpture, entitled Petra , which has already captured the prestigious Leinemann Foundation Award for fine
arts, was put on display in Dresden last week. Local security officials were not amused. The artist has received letters of condemnation from state security services and local officials. The gallery however, told AFP news service that
despite official outrage, response from the public has been overwhelmingly positive .
|
18th January | | |
Google resist Spanish demand to censor specified newspaper articles from search listings
| See
article from media.cbronline.com
|
Google has said it will challenge Spain's data protection authority Agencia Española de Protección de Datos demand to remove 100 defamatory articles in newspapers and official gazettes from its search listings. The search engine has been quoted in
a Guardian story arguing that it acts only as an intermediary and therefore it cannot be held responsible for all content on the internet. Google's director of external relations for Europe Peter Barron said: Requiring intermediaries like search
engines to censor material published by others would have a profound, chilling effect on free expression without protecting people's privacy. The data regulator said the only way to block access to sensitive material published by some sites is
by doing so in the search engine listings.
|
17th January | | |
Hungarians take the street to demonstrate against repressive new media law
| See article
from sofiaecho.com
|
An estimated 10,000 Hungarians have demonstrated Friday against what critics describe as Europe's most restrictive media law. Under the legislation, media in Hungary can face heavy fines and sanctions if authorities deem their coverage unbalanced or
immoral. Thousands of Hungarians sang Friday that if they would be a flag they wouldn't wave, or if they would be a rose, they wouldn't flourish. Hungarian journalists aren't the only people concerned about what critics call Europe's
most restrictive media law. Activist Sonja Andrassew of environmental group Greenpeace says she fears the legislation will make it more difficult to criticize environmental policies. We think that the environmental protection is also [about] free
press. So if we want to say our opinion about the environment, the global warming or anything we need the press to be free to write down our opinion, she said. Critics say that with the media law the center-right government is turning Hungary
into Orbanistan , a reference to Prime minister Viktor Orban and autocratic Central Asian nations.
|
16th January | | |
Italian Big Brother ejects 3 contestants over religious cussing
| See article from telegraph.co.uk
|
Grande Fratello , the Italian version of Big Brother , has disqualified three contestants after the Catholic Church complained about blasphemy. Big Brother, a flag ship programme on Silvio Berlusconi's Mediaset network, has been
forced into a humiliating climb down after the Church objected to contestants on the reality television show uttering blasphemous insults. The swearing by three male contestants infuriated the Catholic Church, with the attack led by Avvenire
, an influential daily newspaper owned by the Catholic Bishops' Conference. The offending remarks were bleeped when they were broadcast, but according to media insiders included Mannaggia la Madonna – Damn the Virgin Mary –
and Dio maiale , which literally translates as God pig and is considered highly offensive by Italians. The show's presenter, Alessia Marcuzzi, read out a statement saying the programme would not tolerate language that offends the
sensitivity of the public . For the powerful Catholic lobby, the matter was made worse by the fact that one of the offending contestants, Massimo Scattarella, had been kicked out of the previous Big Brother series for blasphemy, but had been
readmitted by public vote for the 11th season. |
15th January | | |
Euro ISPs unimpressed by EU proposed mandate of ISP website blocking
| See article from
theregister.co.uk See also Blocking sites leads to less policing of criminal content
from pcpro.co.uk
|
The European Commission has drafted new laws to force ISPs to block child porn. The measure will be voted on by the European Parliament next month. The technical solutions envisaged are broadly based on arrangements in the UK, where all major ISPs block
access to child abuse websites named on a list maintained by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). If the laws are passed as proposed, the UK government will get powers to force the small ISPs who do not use the IWF blocklist – who serve less
than 2% of British internet users – to fall into line. Last year the Home Office abandoned a pledge to enforce 100% compliance. Although voluntary, the British system is not without controversy, and EuroISPA, the European ISP trade
association, is lobbying MEPs to reject the move to enforce it across the bloc. Malcolm Hutty, the President of EuroISPA, said: In order to make the Directive on child sexual exploitation as strong as possible, emphasis must
be placed on making swift notice and takedown of child sexual abuse material focused and effective. Blocking, as an inefficient measure, should be avoided. Law enforcement authorities' procedures for rapid communication to internet hosting providers of
such illegal material must be reviewed and bottlenecks eliminated.
|
13th January | | |
Max Mosley petitions European court for privacy protection from the press
| See article from
iol.co.za
|
Max Mosley, the former president of Formula One, was in a European court on 10 January hoping to secure a new law barring newspapers from publishing details of people's private lives without forewarning. Mosley is asking the European Court of
Human Rights in Strasbourg to make it illegal for a newspaper to publish intrusive material without prior notification. He claimed that it was a great fallacy to think this would inhibit press freedom. But campaigners have warned that a prior notification
rule could damage valid investigative journalism as well as suppressing kiss and tell journalism, by giving anyone who does not like what is about to appear about them in the press time to seek an injunction to prevent publication. The
UK Government opposes Mosley's application. It's really a very simple thing that if a newspaper is going to write something about your private life, or something you might reasonably wish to keep reasonably private, that they should tell you
beforehand, Mosley told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: The fact of the matter is, in 99 cases out of 100, if they are going to write something about someone of any real interest, they will approach the person. But Geoffrey Robinson QC
warned: The vast scope of the new law which is contended for is so vague as to be unworkable.
|
12th January | | |
Hungarian writers and musician campaign against new media censorship law
| See
article from independent.co.uk
|
Hungarian writers and musicians have descended on Brussels to add their voices to the chorus of criticism aimed at censorship being introduced by Prime Minister Victor Orban. The criticism centres on a new media law which came into force on 1
January. Opponents say it will muzzle press freedom and endanger independent media. Adam Fischer, one of the world's leading conductors, stood down at the end of last year as music director at the Hungarian State Opera in protest at the
increasingly heavy and restrictive hand of government: A lot of the attention has focussed on the new law but the problems run far deeper . Even more worrying are changes to the national constitution that are being drafted and the rise of
anti-Semitism, homophobia and xenophobia in Hungarian society, Fischer pointed to the latest attack in which Hungarian pianist Andras Schiff became the butt of anti-Semitic remarks in a national newspaper after he wrote a column
criticising new government measures. Neelie Kroes, the EU's Digital Communications Commissioner, reminded Orban of his pledges to make adjustments if EU experts find the law falling short of full respect of the European values on media
freedom . The European Commission is currently examining the text.
|
10th January | | |
Maltese TV show suspended over throwing shoes at photos of president
| See
article from timesofmalta.com
|
Malta's satirical television programme VIP Xow has been suspended by the national broadcaster after the station editor found a clip aired in last Monday's show to be illegal and in bad taste. The offensive part involved a game in which
contestants were asked to hurl shoes at three tins featuring photos of President George Abela, Prime Minister Lawrence Gonzi and Labour leader Joseph Muscat. According to law it is illegal to ridicule the President. Following a meeting of the
Public Broadcasting Services' editorial board, the VIP Xow producers were informed their programme was being suspended with immediate effect. The decision was taken on grounds that the board had to ensure laws were respected and that the station's
reputation was not prejudiced. On last Monday's show, Prof. Arnold Cassola was one of four guests. When it was his turn to play the shoe-throwing game, the tins were brought very close to him so he could hit them easily, knock them down and
finally win something – a play on his party's lack of electoral success. The decision taken by PBS to black out the game was criticised by the Front Against Censorship. Despite not being aired on TVM, the clip was uploaded onto
Facebook and the video-sharing website You Tube. It was then removed from circulation after the VIP Xow team were advised to withdraw it by their lawyer.
|
9th January | | |
Hungarian media censor moves into rapid action
| See article from freemuse.org
|
Hungary's newly established media censor has opened an inquiry into a small private radio station, Tilos, for broadcasting the song Warning, it's on by US rapper Ice-T, Agence France-Presse reported. Hungary's new legislation came
into force on 1 January 2011. A letter from the new media authority, published on the radio station's website, said Ice-T's song was gangster-rap and could influence the development of minors in a negative way because it was
broadcasted in the afternoon hours. Tilos should have broadcast it after 21:00, it said. Hungarian websites said the letter recalled the Communist days of the 1960s and 1970s when censors warned against the destructive potential of punk music.
Update: Censors back down 17th January 2011. See
article from sofiaecho.com After a public outcry, the Council backed down this week, but radio announcers are concerned that the media authority now watches over their shoulders.
|
4th January | | |
Swedish hockey referee suspended over Mohammed cartoon on his Facebook page
| See article from
gatesofvienna.blogspot.com
|
A referee has been suspended by the Swedish Hockey Association over a cartoon of Mohammed on his Facebook page According to sources, SÄPO [the Swedish security police] were contacted. We had a meeting with this person and we agree that
he should take a time out, said Swedish Hockey Association's security chief censor Peter Anderson. According to Sportbladet the referee was confronted with information that he published a cartoon of Mohammed on his Facebook page. The Security
manager also had a transcript of the page The referee admitted that he posted the picture and referred to the right to freedom of expression, said a source. Peter Anderson would not comment, but later gave a brief comment: We had
a meeting with a person who is a district referee. During the meeting, we agreed he should take time out the rest of the season. For reasons which I definitely do not want to go into, says Peter Anderson. According to Sportbladet, the Hockey
Association has had contact with the Security Police concerning the potential threat that publishing the cartoon can bring.
|
|
|